
Kristin's Ethics prof recently pointed out that the dean of our law school didn't feel like taking the bar and decided to take it all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Check out the district Court opinion at 372 F. Supp. 1175:
Graduate of the University of Chicago Law School and resident of the State of Montana brought suit challenging, on equal protection grounds, the constitutionality of Montana's statutorily enacted 'diploma privilege,' under which the graduates of the University of Montana Law School are excepted from undergoing an examination as to their qualifications prior to their admission to the Montana Bar. A three-judge District Court, Battin, J., held that (1) the appropriate standard of review was whether any rational justification could be stated for the existence of the diploma privilege, not whether it was justified by a compelling governmental interest, (2) the diploma privilege does bear a reasonable relationship to an applicant's fitness and capacity to practice law, and (3) the diploma privilege does not infringe on other law school graduates' constitutional right to freely travel from state to state.
Survey says (Supreme Court survey that is) . . .
Relief DENIED!